| Author:
James D. Layton |
Degree:
Ph.D. |
Date Graduated: Oct
1997 |
Title: COMMUNITY
COLLEGES AND THE INTERNET: USES AND IMPACTS (COMPUTER USE)
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the possible and probable
use of the Internet, the WWW, and related technologies by community
colleges, and the possible consequences of these uses. To carry out
the study, a panel of 27 experts in community colleges and the Internet
and related technologies participated in an electronic Delphi study.
Using a web site on the Internet set up for the purpose of conducting
this study, the panel reached consensus on items on the questionnaire
related to ten scenarios describing applications in functional areas
of community college activities. The first research question asked
about the usefulness of the Internet, the WWW, and related technologies
for community colleges. Activities in all ten scenarios were rated
as at least moderately useful, while seven of the scenarios were
judged to be very useful. Respondents judged the most useful scenario
to be library and learning resources, with the least useful being
student, faculty and staff services.
The second research question asked about the applicability of these
uses for community colleges. The applicability ratings of all of
the applications were at least moderate, and five scenarios were
rated as being very applicable. The library and learning resources
scenario was rated the most applicable while the business and industry
relations and economic development scenario was thought to be the
least applicable.
The third research question was concerned with the feasibility
of these uses for community colleges. All of the activities were
judged to be moderately feasible. The most feasible scenario was
library and learning resources, while respondents gave the lowest
feasibility rating to the student, faculty and staff services scenario.
The fourth research question asked respondents to rate the likely
consequences of these uses for community colleges in the areas of
student outcomes, institutional productivity, institutional effectiveness,
and institutional culture and climate. All four areas had ratings
between moderate and strong in the direction of positive impacts,
and potential negative impact was rated between weak and moderate.
|