he paradox of developmental education in the United States is that,
while community college policy affirms its importance for achieving
the community college mission, the funding to support developmental
education is not always sufficient to support the numbers of students
who need such assistance. A recent nationwide study, conducted by
The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education (1999),
reveals that, according to college professors, administrators, government
officials, and business leaders, the number one problem facing colleges
today is that too many new students need remedial education.
The roots of developmental education in America reach back to the
early 1800s, but it was the 1947 report from the President's Commission
on Higher Education that provided the national mandate for developmental
education and placed it squarely within the mission of community
colleges. This Commission stated that "[the community college]
will attempt to meet the total post-high school needs of its community."
At present, developmental education courses and programs, designed
to enhance literacy and basic skills, permeate the American community
college environment. These programs again received national attention
when President Clinton signed the Goals 2000, Educate America Act,
and literacy, one of the eight goals of American education, became
required by law.
What constitutes developmental education? It is generally defined
as those instructional and support activities designed to keep unprepared
students in college and help them improve their basic skills so
that they can successfully complete a program and achieve their
educational goals.
Why are community college students required to take developmental
education courses? Most colleges administer some type of placement
test to entering students to assess their abilities in reading,
writing, and mathematics. Students who do not score above a prescribed
level on a particular placement test are then required to enroll
in appropriate developmental courses. In 1996, for example, nearly
86 percent of Illinois community college students enrolled in developmental
education were more than 20 years old (ICCB, 1997). Although most,
if not all, of these students learned reading, writing, and mathematics
skills in their secondary education, the passage of time since high
school, often exceeding 20 or more years, has probably caused them
to forget much of what they had learned previously.
Stanley Ikenberry, former president of the University of Illinois
and current president of the American Council on Education, agrees
that no one particularly likes remedial (developmental) education,
and it would be easier for faculty and colleges if students came
to college prepared to pursue their chosen programs. Colleges offer
developmental education programs simply because students come unprepared,
according to Ikenberry, and community colleges would be advised
to fix the deficiency (Ikenberry & Stix, 1998).
If community colleges understand and accept the premise that providing
developmental education is central to their mission, why then do
these programs continue to receive less funding than baccalaureate-oriented
or technical programs? Perhaps one possible solution to this problem
lies within federal and state funding policy. For example, current
educational policy in Illinois prescribes that community colleges
will be reimbursed for developmental education courses at a rate
which is considerably lower than that for baccalaureate-oriented
or technical courses.
According to The Institute for Higher Education Policy (1998),
"... it seems quite apparent that society needs more, not less,
educated people and should do all that is possible to make this
a reality." At this point, one might ask what might be an economic
or social outcome if community colleges continue making developmental
education a low priority? Perhaps all of higher education, especially
education policy-makers, would be well-advised to consider the possible
economic and social consequences if developmental education remains
a low priority in America.
References
Cohen, A. M., & Brawer, F. B. (1996). The American Community
College (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Illinois Community College Board. (1997). Remedial/Developmental
Education in the Illinois Community College System. Springfield,
IL.
Ikenberry, S. O. & Stix, N. (1998, June). Should Colleges
Offer Remedial Education Programs for Students?, Symposium conducted
in Insight on the News, Washington Times Corporation, Washington,
DC.
The National Center for Public Policy and Higher Education. (1999,
January). Taking Responsibility: Leaders' Expectations of Higher
Education. (National Center Report No. 99-1). San Jose, CA:
Author.
The Institute For Higher Education Policy. (1998, December). College
Remediation: What It Is, What It Costs, What's At Stake. Washington:
Author.
The President's Commission on Higher Education. (1947).New York:
Harper & Brothers.
Jackie Davis has been involved in community college education for
twenty years. He is currently dean of instruction at Olney Central
College in Olney, Illinois. Jackie is a doctoral student specializing
in Community College Executive Leadership at UIUC.
|